Supranational Society: Masterlist of 2,000 NGOs and the Top 400 People in Them

Above and below the reader can find names of prominent individuals ranked according to the number of NGOs - and a number of key corporations - they (at the very least) have historically been involved with. Overall, this appears to be a very accurate "influence index" when it comes to, once and for all, and in rather scientific manner, identifying the "powers-that-be". The focus is on the West, including Israel, but it is also possible to get a good sense of the situation in Russia.

As the reader will soon realize, most of the individuals listed in the "Superclass Index" - whether they are "liberal elite", "conservative elite", or "neocons" - know one another VERY well and all have the same opinions when it comes to Third World immigration and opposition to "conspiracy theory" in particular. Anyone with an interest in globalization or parapolitical issues would do well to become familiar with this network. After all, it is what secretly dominates our society at every level.

It's possible to check the rankings for yourself by doing searches on this page for particular (sur)names. Over 300 still-alive persons are listed at this point. Hundreds of additional "helpers" can be added if we start looking at individuals having been involved in less than 10 NGOs. The absolute top, mainly consisting of the closest friends of the late David Rockefeller, is by far the most important though. They have built and dominated this global network from at least the 1950s to the 2020s.

The above colors have been used to give an indication of each person's professional background. The reader can count all the think tanks, foundations, and other NGOs each person in this list is involved in by going through ISGP's NGO list.

"The Kay [Graham] of the permanent establishment never lost sight of the fact that societies thrive not by the victories of their factions but by their ultimate reconciliations. Kay and I met in 1969 at the home of Joe Alsop, another member of Washington's permanent establishment."

"[Think tanks] exert definite and even considerable influence on the process of elaborating and making political decisions. It is connected with the fact that ... leaders of such centers have as a rule personal close links with the [government]. Second, the centers are created in order to prepare and adopt the major political decisions in the shade, far from public. Third, such analytical and expert centers really accumulate the best intellectual forces of the country and fourth, not always but rather often, the centers were founded simply to provide jobs to [retired] politicians."

"In addition to supplying experts for incoming administrations, think tanks provide departing officials with institutional settings [where they] remain engaged in pressing foreign policy debates, and constitute an informal shadow foreign affairs establishment. This "revolving door" is unique to the United States, and a source of its strength. ...

"Think tanks provide policy-makers with venues in which to build shared understanding, if not consensus, on policy options... Among think tanks, the non-partisan Council on Foreign Relations has been most adept at this convening role, hosting hundreds of meetings annually in New York, Washington, and major cities around the country. For U.S. officials, events at major think tanks offer non-partisan settings to announce new initiatives, explain current policy, and launch trial balloons."

"Long after the Iraq War went south, when its failures could no longer be minimized, the elite newspapers and weeklies finally got around to offering sound analyses and asking the Bush Administration tough questions. ...

"My initial support for the [2003 Iraq] war was symptomatic of unfortunate tendencies within the foreign policy community, namely the disposition and incentives to support wars to retain political and professional credibility. We 'experts' have a lot to fix about ourselves."

Sources

The names of institutes and individuals on this page have been gathered over the course of more than a thousand hours over 17 years from sources as:

• books;
• newspapers;
• official websites (don't forget Webarchive);
• unofficial websites (names were always double checked);
• a number of membership lists;
• and the Who's Who.

Many fully-written-out sources can be found in various articles and mixed membership-biography lists on this website. However, providing specific sources on the names with each institute has proven to be completely impossible due to time constraints.

All mid- to low level institutes - those without any recognizable superclass names on the various boards - have been left out of these lists. This oversight really is about the 1,500 most important NGOs, with a few dozen key corporations mixed in where elites have also gathered through various board memberships over the decades.

Importance

This page has primarily been put together to make cross-referencing - as to who is involved in what - a hundred times easier than before. And maybe even more important, also to figure out in a rather scientific way as to which players are the most influential within the globalist movement.

People studying political science should have a good idea of the non-government organizations listed on this page. They vary considerable in purpose and influence, but are an integral part of the globalization process, as well as intelligence and covert operations. For an explanation of how various establishments overlap with each other, or maybe "oppose" one another, the reader can visit the introduction page.

What keeps this entire network afloat are funds from corporations and foundations, membership fees, fund raisers and occasional government grants. Ban the foundations, curb corporate contributions, and the whole network will start to fall apart.

Let's face it, if you don't know anything about the NGOs making up the private, supranational superclass running national governments in the West, it doesn't matter how many political degrees you have: you don't know, and never will know, anything about real politics.

Interestingly, back in early 2004 this author was unable to find more than six or seven of the more important organizations below on one website or in one book, even after looking for it all over the place. Often groups like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission were mixed in with the "Illuminati", the "Freemasons" and the "New World Order". Tiny bits of information on such groups as the Pilgrims, Le Cercle, the 1001 Club, the JASON Group, the Sun Valley Meetings and others were scattered all over the place and often not freely accessible. Information on mainland Europe with regard to these kind of groups was especially scarce. And in all cases no one had a clue how various groups related to each other.

As the reader can see on ISGP, this situation has changed. A lot.