ISGP
ISGP
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • CENTERS
    • NGO Study Center
    • Alt. Media Study Center
    • 9/11 Study Center
    • Child Abuse Research
    • Immigration Center
  • FAQ
  • SCOOPS
  • SEARCH
  • LATEST
    • Conservative CIA
    • Liberal CIA: Music
    • Liberal CIA: Hollywood
    • Immigration: Soros-EU
    • Immigration polls
    • Google Censorship
    • Opus Dei
    • Psychedelics & elites
  • CONTACT
  • STORE
  • DONATE
conservative-cia
"Conservative CIA"
Harassment
CIA, NSA, GCHQ, Google vs ISGP
Welcome
  • Intro
  • Fake & genuine conspiracies list
  • The Managed Democracy
  • 3-establishment model
  • Boxes Model for politics
  • A neocon non-establishment
  • Russia's establishments
Liberal-globalism
  • 2,000 key NGOs
  • Superclass Index: top 400
  • 1902: Pilgrims Society
  • 1920: ICC: Hitler, Mussolini
  • 1921: CFR
  • 1954: Bilderberg
  • 1971: 1001 Club
  • 1971: Davos
  • 1973: Trilateral Commission
  • 1981: Sun Valley Meetings
  • 1983: NED, IRI, NDI
  • 1989: Forstmann Little
  • 1878: Bohemian Grove
  • Multinat. Chairman's Group
  • TikTok: CFR-owned; not China
"Liberal CIA" activism
  • The "grassroots" myth
  • Immigration-pushing
  • Feminism & LGBTQ
  • Control over Hollywood
  • Control in rock & heavy metal
  • Psychedelics & elitism
"Conservative CIA" activism
  • Network: Trump, Breitbart, etc.
  • Dutch Republican Society
Conservative NGOs
  • American Security Council
  • Le Cercle Pinay: CIA-Opus Dei
  • The real Opus Dei
  • A neocon non-establishment
  • David Teacher's research
National security (NGOs)
  • AFIO & OSS Society: CIA, specops
  • JASON Group: DOD science
  • USAPs & black projects
Censorship
  • Google's war on ISGP: 2015-
  • CIA-NSA-MI6 harassment of ISGP
  • AI interview on conspiracy
"Alternative" media
  • C2C AM: CIA disinfo network
  • Alex Jones: CIA family, disinfo
  • C2C AM's 9/11 "Truth" circus
  • 9/11 gurus: all no-planers
  • The Disclosure Project psyop
  • Mainstream UFO reports: 1942-
  • Psyop: the Roswell UFO crash
  • Psyop: the MJ12 documents
  • Psyop: alien abductions
  • Psyop: Cattle mutilations
  • Psyop: crop circles
  • 54 ways to discredit conspiracy
  • World history in timelines
  • Graham Hancock exposed
  • Atlantis cannot have existed
Conspiracy
  • CIA drugs: 40 cases summarized
  • JFK assassination
  • RFK assassination: all disinfo
  • Pim Fortuyn's assassination
  • Boston Bombing 2013
  • Far West: global terrorism
  • Robert Crowley: CIA ops roman
  • Jonestown: MKULTRA continued?
9/11
  • 68 questions for the 9/11 Comm.
  • Twin Towers collapse analysis
  • WTC 7 collapse analysis
  • Supranational suspects of 9/11
  • Pentagon no-plane disinfo
  • 9/11-no-plane "researchers" list
  • C2C AM's 9/11 psyop circus
  • Popular Mechanics flaws
Child abuse networks
  • The Haut de la Garenne case
  • Jeffrey Epstein affair
  • Kay Griggs investigated
  • Pizzagate: disinfo, truth
  • Beyond the Dutroux Affair
  • "La Nebuleuse"
  • Beyond Dutroux: EIM snuff
  • French elites into child abuse?
  • Demmink/Westerflier cult
  • Sex clubs, sex cults & morgues
  • "Dr. Green" ID-ed
Third World immigration
  • Ehnic IQ research summary
  • Global black crime numbers
  • Polls: 90% oppose immigration
  • Muslim extremism polls
  • Pro-immigration protest-fund...
  • Dutch Muslims: group assault
  • 95% street rape by migrants
  • Media: white guilt tactics
  • TikTok-propaganda: CFR
Remaining
  • Peak oil: the numbers
  • Top 400 curious deaths
  • ISGP Party: Political Stances
  • Miscellaneous
ISGP classics:
Beyond the Dutroux Affair
Dutroux X-Dossiers
Pilgrims Society
The Pilgrims Society
1001 Club
The 1001 Club
Le Cercle Pinay
Le Cercle Pinay

More:
The Supranational Suspects of 911
9/11: Superclass Suspects
usap-s and secrecy levels
USAPs & secrecy levels
Rockefeller CIA
Rockefeller CIA
The Black Dragon Society and Yakuza
The Black Dragon Society
Controlled U.S. elections
Managed democracy: 150 yrs
The best WTC analysis
The best WTC analysis
Russian power cliques: Putin and the various establishments.
Russian power cliques



"An Australian study has found that about one in five corporate executives are psychopaths – roughly the same rate as among prisoners.

"The study of 261 senior professionals in the United States found that 21 per cent had clinically significant levels of psychopathic traits. The rate of psychopathy in the general population is about one in a hundred.

"Nathan Brooks, a forensic psychologist who conducted the study, said the findings suggested that businesses should improve their recruitment screening.

"He said recruiters tend to focus on skills rather than personality features and this has led to firms hiring "successful psychopaths" who may engage in unethical and illegal practices or have a toxic impact on colleagues.

""Typically psychopaths create a lot of chaos and generally tend to play people off against each other," he said.

""For psychopaths, it [corporate success] is a game and they don't mind if they violate morals. It is about getting where they want in the company and having dominance over others."

"The global financial crisis in 2008 has prompted researchers to study workplace traits that may have allowed a corporate culture in which unethical behaviour was able to flourish.

"Mr Brooks's research, conducted with a colleague from Australia's Bond University and a researcher from the University of San Diego, was based on a study of corporate professionals in the supply chain management industry across the US.

"The findings, presented on Tuesday at the Australian Psychological Society Congress in Melbourne, are due to be published in the European Journal of Psychology."

- September 13, 2016, The Telegraph, '1 in 5 CEOs are psychopaths, study finds'.

"[Rose:] Whatever we said about a New World Order, it hasn't evolved the way you thought it might.

"[Huntington:] Well, certainly the euphoria that existed in 1989 after the Berlin Wall came down has disappeared and I think there were great hopes at that time that we were entering a New World Order, that this was gonna be a world in which western ideas of liberal democracy and capitalism would [come to include Russia and] sweep across the world and that a new era of harmony would emerge.

"Well, that hasn't happened."

- January 30, 1997, Charlie Rose interview with Samuel Huntington on his book The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order.

"[Interventionist New Right conservative and later neocon Senator Barry Goldwater] was a new ideological force in the Republican Party. Until then, the Eastern Establishment view based on historic models of European history was the dominant view of foreign policy. This new foreign-policy view was more missionary; it emphasized that America had a mission to bring about democracy—if necessary, by the use of force. And it had a kind of intolerance toward opposition. It then became characteristic of both the extreme Right and the extreme Left, and they changed sides occasionally. ...

"Some, like Norman Podhoretz—who's a good friend today—[during the Detente years] attacked me from both the left and the right sequentially. ...

"Well, you have the view that Reagan started the process with his Evil Empire speech, which, in my opinion, occurred at the point when the Soviet Union was already well on the way to defeat. We were engaged in a long-term struggle, generating many competing analyses. I was on the hard-line side of the analysis. But I stressed also the diplomatic and psychological dimensions. We needed to wage the Cold War from a posture in which we would not be isolated, and in which we would have the best possible basis for conducting unavoidable conflicts. Finally, we had a special obligation to find a way to avoid nuclear conflict, since that risked civilization. We sought a position to be ready to use force when necessary but always in the context of making it clearly demonstrable as a last resort. The neoconservatives took a more absolutist view. Reagan used the span of time that was available to him with considerable tactical skill, although I'm not sure that all of it was preconceived. But its effect was extremely impressive. I think the détente period was an indispensable prelude. ...

"That's the challenge [cooperating with China]. That's the open question. It's our task. We're not good at it, because we don't understand their history and culture. I think that their basic thinking is Sinocentric [China-centric]. But it may produce consequences that are global in impact. Therefore, the challenge of China is a much subtler problem than that of the Soviet Union. The Soviet problem was largely strategic. This is a cultural issue: Can two civilizations that do not, at least as yet, think alike come to a coexistence formula that produces world order? ..."

"Breaking Russia has become an objective [to neoconservatives and liberal hawks]; the long-range purpose should be to integrate it. ... [Hawks keep supporting the breaking of Russia] until they face the consequences. The trouble with America's wars since the end of the Second World War has been the failure to relate strategy to what is possible domestically. The five wars we've fought since the end of World War II were all started with great enthusiasm. But the hawks did not prevail at the end. At the end, they were in a minority. We should not engage in international conflicts if, at the beginning, we cannot describe an end, and if we're not willing to sustain the effort needed to achieve that end. ... We refuse to learn from experience. Because it's essentially done by an ahistorical people. In schools now, they don't teach history anymore as a sequence of events. They deal with it in terms of themes without context. ... "

"Germany has never in its national history starting in 1871 had to run an international system. From 1871 to 1890, Bismarck conducted a spectacular tour de force that was not sustainable. You can't have a great policy if it requires a genius in every generation. But from 1890 to the end of the Second World War—nearly a century—Germany was embattled in its perception of the world around it.Britain and France have much more experience [than Germany] in multilateral diplomacy. So I have sympathy for the German dilemma. They can help, they may be decisive in helping, but they need a bigger, more global framework, which we need to contribute. ... That's a pity [the newest generation of German CDU members have little interest in the United States]."

- August 19, 2015, The National Interest, 'The Interview: Henry Kissinger' (words of Kissinger alone).


"I frankly think that crisis initiation is really tough and it's very hard for me to see how the United States president can get us to war with Iran, which leads me to conclude that if, in fact, compromise is not coming that the traditional way America gets to war is what would be best for U.S. interests.

"Some people might think that when Roosevelt wanted to get us into World War II, as David mentioned, you may recall he had to wait for Pearl Harbor. Some people might think that Wilson wanted to get us into World War I; you may remember he had to wait for the Lusitania episode. Some people might think that Mr. Johnson wanted to send troops to Vietnam; you may recall he had to wait for the Gulf of Tonkin episode. We didn't go to war with Spain until the USS Maine exploded.

"And, may I point out, that Mr. Lincoln did not feel he could call out the federal army until Fort Sumter was attacked, which is why he ordered the commander at Fort Sumter to do exactly that thing which the South Carolinians had said would cause an attack.

"So, if in fact the Iranians aren't going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war."

"One can combine other means of pressure with sanctions. I mentioned that explosion on August 17th. We could step up the pressure. I mean, look people, Iranian submarines periodically go down; some day one of them may not come up. Who would know why? We can do a variety of things if we wish to increase the pressure. I'm not advocating that, but I'm just suggesting that this is not a either/or proposition. It's just, sanctions have to succeed or other things [will happen]. We are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians. We could get nastier at that."

- September 2012, Patrick Clawson, director for WINEP's Iran Security Initiative, in a speech to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) (available on Youtube). Advisory board members of WINEP have included former CIA director James Woolsey, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Henry Kissinger, George Shultz and other top superclass members (the latter two here are not primarily neocons).


"We commend Secretary of State John Kerry's extraordinary efforts to renew Israeli-Palestinian talks and negotiations for a framework for a peace accord, and the strong support his initiative has received from President Barack Obama. ...

"U.S. disapproval of continued settlement enlargement in the Occupied Territories by Israel's government as “illegitimate” and “unhelpful” does not begin to define the destructiveness of this activity. Nor does it dispel the impression that we have come to accept it despite our rhetorical objections. Halting the diplomatic process on a date certain until Israel complies with international law and previous agreements would help to stop this activity and clearly place the onus for the interruption where it belongs. ...

" Surely the “incitement” of Palestinian rhetoric hardly compares to the incitement of Israel's actual confiscations of Palestinian territory. If the United States is not prepared to say so openly, there is little hope for the success of these talks..."

- April 8, 2014, Politico Magazine, 'Stand Firm, John Kerry'. Written by Zbigniew Brzezinski, Frank Carlucci, Lee Hamilton and Carla Hills, all in ISGP's Superclass Index and key figures in the Liberal Establishment. Brzezinski and Hills are particularly close to the Rockefeller interests. Brzezinski has also been a long-time mentor of Obama and vocal opponent of radical Zionist and neoconservative policy.

The Basics of Supranational Politics: NGOs, Superclass Index, Four-Establishment Model and Box Models

By: Joël van der Reijden | Date: November 9, 2013 | Updated: Aug. 8, 2023.
(Shortened version in preparation for a rewrite)

4-establishment-model

"[Congressman] Jan de Wit aksed me to answer your question. [Our party] is focused on formal political relations … With your question we enter the extra-parliamentary domain of parapolitics; informal, non-public organizations in which influence-forming is practiced, often by persons in influential government positions and/or from the corporate world who together make political decisions without oversight. ...

"Too little concrete information is available about [Le Cercle and hundreds of] other organizations besides Bilderberg to be used in parliamentary sessions. ... As far as I know, the topic [of Bilderberg] has never been discussed in the past 8.5 years [that I've been here in congress]."

 
Oct. 11 and 19, 2010 emails to this author from G. van Leemput, a foreign affairs and defense aide to Dutch Socialist Party Senator (1995-1998) and Congressman (1998-2014) Jan de Wit.


  1. The standard model of politics and its limitations

  2. Notes

"[Katharine Graham] of the permanent establishment never lost sight of the fact that societies thrive not by the victories of their factions but by their ultimate reconciliations."

 
July 23, 2001, Henry Kissinger, Eulogy for Katharine Graham of the Washington Post.


"One-third of modern history is still classified* ... [An] intelligence officer turned art teacher ... displayed a color slide of an abstract sculpture. The piece was over six feet tall, of metal branches all intertwined... It was, to all appearances, a random column of ugliness. Hardly the model for a book. "Don't look at the sculpture itself," our friend advised. "Look at the holes." Inside the twisted sculpture was an orderly pattern of smooth ovals, arranged in perfect balance, making sense of the whole...

"Known history is like the visible surface of the sculpture, a series of harsh, twisted, seemingly unconnected branches. The hidden parts of history, the covert sides, are more orderly and rational, but can be seen and understood only if you are told where to look. The holes in history are what makes sense of the thing; the hidden motives, secret agendas, classified purposes... "

 
John Loftus, Mark Aarons, The secret war against the Jews, pp. 2 & 12. (*reference to the national security vaults). Loftus once held some of the highest security clearances in the U.S. and NATO and is often considered a respectable author. However, nothing is ever as it seems, as is being implied by his own metaphor. Even he himself is not at all who he often pretends to be.

The standard model of politics and its limitations

ISGP-scoops-unique-documents
Unique documents first published by ISGP.

There are different ways to look at the world when it comes to politics. In western countries we tend to look at the various political parties, the elected heads of state, the ministers and their interactions with parliament and the public. We shouldn't forget the role of the media, which actually serves a purpose besides entertainment: its most important function is to act as a fourth pillar to the Trias Politica, a reference to the separation of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches in many western governments. The media's primary role are to help act as a guardian to the democratic process. If the government has been corrupted, or outside forces try to influence the democratic process in any unfair way, the idea is that there are always untainted media outlets that can investigate and inform the public about it.

After the internal political makeup of a country has been analyzed, including the fact whether or not it has a free media and fair elections, it is generally time to look at the country's external relations. Every country on the planet maintains political, economic and/or military relationships with other countries. These relations can be good, bad or anything in between. Over the course of the 20th century, and especially since the end of World War II, these one-on-one or small-circle relations have increasingly been replaced by international institutes where many countries are represented at the same time. Well known examples of these international institutes include the United Nations, the European Union, NATO and the G8 meetings. Specifically on the economic front there are the World Bank, the IMF, the OECD and the World Trade Organization. Through all these organizations countries in the West and around the world try to work out their political, military and economic issues.

However, sometimes events happen in Western countries that cannot be explained by this standard model. Senior officials of the BCCI bank and police investigators being intimidated by a CIA-Mossad-related "black network", Belgian officials gathering information on a similar "nebula", or Daniel Casolaro committing suicide while investigating another similar "Octopus" fall into that category. Basically, the hundreds of unusual deaths this author has come across over the years can be considered a mystery, because not one of them has ever been proved to be government related - even though that's often where all the evidence is pointing to. My own experiences related to intimidation can be considered outside of the standard political model, because my research was essentially focused on non-government organizations. Then there are cases as:

  1. the Kennedy assassination;

  2. CIA-support for drug cartels and drug dealing dictators;

  3. the Dutroux X-Dossiers in Belgium;

  4. 9/11, or, if we choose to be tactical, the dozens of questions the media allowed the 9/11 Commission to leave unanswered and the complete media ban on asking any critical questions with regard to the extremely flawed NIST reports for the Twin Towers and WTC 7;

  5. how it is possible that near 100% of 9/11 Truth researchers have promoted extremely manipulative 9/11 no-plane theories;

  6. Boston 2013;

  7. the 1999 Russian Apartment Bombings;

  8. the never-reported fact that virtually every U.S. administration since Eisenhower, Republican or Democrat, had very close ties to the Rockefeller family;

  9. the never-reported fact that HUGE chunks of the "new left" media and activism network take money from an elite network of Eastern Establishment foundations worth $150 billion;

  10. the never-reported fact that these same foundations have been massively influencing the Third World immigration debate;

  11. the complete suppression of black crime numbers, Arab crime numbers and genetic IQ in favor of extremist open borders policies.

Anybody who has spent at least a few hundred hours looking into these events can see that there is an overwhelming amount of evidence that not all is exactly as the media or our school books are portraying these events to be - however hard it may be for the average person to put in the necessary study hours and to accept the somewhat paradigm-shattering conclusions and social awkwardness associated with these topics. The fact is that influential establishments really do appear to exist and that they are able to organize and get away with conspiracies like the ones above. Unfortunately, no (intellectual or complete) political model exists to explain these events. We'll be introducing such a model in this article.

In addition, what also no one has come up with is a good explanation as to why both the mainstream, alternative and conspiracy media continue to distort the truth to such extremes. Yes, with the mainstream media a basic explanation would involve financial interests and ties to the government and superclass. We actually also see these ties in much of the so-called anti-establishment "new left" "liberal CIA" network, with plenty of evidence existing that the conspiracy media most certainly is controlled by the security services.

Still, what remains quite unexplained to me is that rational conspiracy theory as discussed by ISGP basically is never discussed in any of the small-time publications around the world. It certainly seems to show that people are very easily intimidated and just don't dare to research, do, or speak out about anything that falls outside the norm. That is, when it results in them having to give up everything all at once: money, career, status, women, comfort, possibly health, and that combined with being the subject of endless ridicule or the same old cliche jokes. Even with this though, it remains hard to explain this level of control over truly independent information with only an establishment model. Still, such a model does get us very far, much further than any classic non-establishment model.

One of the first models ever created by ISGP: still accurate.

As for this new political model that we need, it turns out that over the course of the 20th century, and especially after World War II, a massive amount of private think tanks and social clubs have been set up, much of it financed by a rather small group of banks, multinationals and foundations - and sometimes aided by membership fees and limited government subsidies.

This website has spent over ten years crawling through these networks, in the process gathering and categorizing the names of over 2,000 private groups and "independent" government advisory boards. Some of these groups are focused on economic integration; others more on sustainable development, domestic policy, foreign policy, diplomatic relations or national security. And what they have in common is that no one has learned about them in school. While in the early 21st century an increasing amount of studies are being conducted on these groups - largely in response to the overwhelming amount of conspiracy literature available, not the least of it ISGP - conclusions reached in these studies still haven't made it into national school books or even in a proper, unbiased matter to the mass media. And thus the supranational model of politics hasn't yet seeped into the public consciousness.

There's always the question how much influence the men running this private network (a small group dominates) have, because, frankly, there's almost no testimony from senior government officials to what extent they listen and implement the advice of these men. All of a sudden grown men start giggling like little girls, shrugging off all relevant questions. Bilderberg truly is a great example. The group is closely linked to the Netherlands, because of the role of the Dutch royal family in it. Despite the fact that the group once every few years made the news, before the age of the internet, few Dutch people had really ever heard about it, even though the group has met annually since 1952. Here's what a foreign policy expert of a long-serving member of Dutch parliament explained about Bilderberg to ISGP:

 
"To be honest, little can be said with certainty about the way Bilderberg influences [politics]. ... Members of the government go there - the queen and one or two ministers – [but] no report is provided to congress. …

"Besides [Harry] van Bommel there are NO members of congress who have asked formal questions. ... As far as I know, the topic has never been discussed in the past 8.5 years [that I've been here]."

At one point van Bommel brought up a few basic questions involving Bilderberg, the only result being that these questions were laughed off by the state secretary for European affairs, Frans Timmermans, a visitor of Bilderberg meetings. Isn't that amazing? What's wrong with questions about what has been discussed at these meetings? Apparently there in an unwritten rule in Dutch parliament to not discuss these groups.

Trilateral Commission meeting at White House
1974 Trilateral Commission board meeting at the White House, with David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Elliot Richardson, George Franklin (all Pilgrims until here), Francois Duchene, Max Kohnstamm and a president of the revived Mitsubishi zaibatsu.

Judging by U.S. congressional records, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission have never been part of the daily discourse either. Why not? Of course, there's only one obvious answer which everyone already knows: influence is coming from these groups. There actually are very, very few instances in which this influence has been clearly documented, simply because the media and politicians - like Frans Timmermans above - not only refuse to address the issue, they prefer to make the masses feel uncomfortable asking these questions in the first place by ridiculing anyone who does.

Still, occasionally we find examples of the influence of these groups. In one instance the influence of the European Round Table (ERT), a group with very close links to Bilderberg, was described. On June 23, 2003, the Belgian Jan Puype, the only independent journalist who appears to have attended a meeting of the ERT, at least until that point, wrote about one of the council's meetings that year which was attended by Romano Prodi, a prime minister of Italy from 1996 to 1998 and again from 2006 to 2008. At the time he visited the ERT, Prodi was president of the European Commission, a position he held from 1999 to 2004. It appears Prodi was groomed by the liberal establishment: as a political science professor at the University of Bologna, he had been a member of the Bilderberg steering committee in the 1981-1982 period. According to Puype, by 2003 Prodi was still influenced by these business elites:

 
"I was a guest at the birthday party of the ERT, which existed 20 years in 2003. That was a surreal feeling. I was the only journalist and walked between De Benedetti, Davignon [chairman of Bilderberg], Leysen, Prodi. 'What am I doing here for God's sake', was I thinking. But it was very interesting to see how things were done, of course...

"I thought I was hallucinating [when Gerhard Cromme of ThyssenKrupp and the CFR began to speak]. Prodi was put in his place like a little kid [for having criticized the United States]. It became even more remarkable when the Commission chairman started to speak himself. He held a speech like 'friends, I will not do it again and I will be good from now on'. A completely different Prodi than the man I saw on television raising his finger against the Americans.

"You can't say that the ERT decides everything that happens in Europe, but her influence is enormous... The ERT has a very efficient way of lobbying. The members write papers on the direction Europe should be going in terms of the environment, competition, technology, etc. Once these papers are finished inside the ERT, the machine starts running. The club sends out a team of delegates consisting of the most important members to the European Commission. Individual members take the messages to their national governments. The ERT thinks very pro-active. She is often the first to work on certain issues. That is also her strength. The introduction of the single currency, the Maastricht-Treaty, the Channel Tunnel, or the [EU's] expansion to the east: that all started at the ERT."
1

*****

Note: On August 8, 2023 the intro article was cut off here in preparation for a much more updated version. The sections on ISGP's three establishment model and its boxes model has been separated and expanded. So is the section discussing all the elite ties of all past U.S. presidential administrations.

Notes


  1. Feb. 16, 2005, #7, Solidair, interview with Jan Puype. [link]

 

















































































© Joel van der Reijden -- Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics (ISGP)
Rock and metal
"Liberal CIA" owns rock, metal
Hollywood
''Liberal CIA'' owns Hollywood







ISGP CENTERS
  • NGO study Center
  • Alternative Media Study Center
  • 9/11 Study Center
  • Child Abuse Research Center
  • Responsible Immigration Center

le-cercle
Mossad-CIA: a bloody history
Cult of Cupid
Surprisingly matrixy
le-cercle
Le Cercle: CIA-MI6-Vatican Govt
JFK assassination
JFK: Who did it? And why?
Coast to Coast AM
National Security Trolls
Atlantis
Why Atlantis never existed
Global racial IQ numbers
Global racial IQ numbers
Kay Griggs
Kay Griggs Investigated
Opus Dei
Opus Dei: Police Report
911
9/11 "Truth" never existed
White guilt warfare manual
48 white guilt tactics
American Security Council
American Security Council
Breaking the matrix
How to break the matrix
Anti-conspiracy psywar manual
54 anti-conspiracy tactics
911
9/11: Supranational Suspects
Immigrant rape crime in Norway
95% of street rape: migrants
Liberal CIA
"Liberal CIA": media, activism
Tiktok ownership
TikTok's globalist owners
Polls on immigration
The EU's Arab crime problem
Immigrant crime numbers
Black crime: 5-30x higher
CIA drug trafficking
40+ cases of CIA drugs
Hollywood
Psychedelics & elitism
Pim Fortuyn assassination
Pim Fortuyn Assassination
Polls on immigration
Polls: immigration opposed
Steven Greer Disinfo
Disclosure Project Sham
911
WTC 7 Data Manipulated
..................................................................
In brief
On this site the reader can find about 90 articles with a total of 1.5 million words, not counting (fully written-out) sources, press reports, membership lists with biographies, and outside work. If the information is reorganized, it would be possible to publish it in ten 400+ page books.

..................................................................
Double-tap tap the center column in pure text areas for mobile view.

TOP
DONATE
"When Benjamin Netanyahu first visited the White House as Israel's prime minister in 1996, things didn't get off to such a great start.

"Undeterred by the razor-thin nature of his upset victory, Netanyahu was on the offensive from the start against President Bill Clinton, trying to reshape American policy. Clinton was so vexed after that first meeting that he vented to aides, "Who's the f—ing superpower here?"

"The famously thin-skinned Netanyahu even tried to get Clinton to fire his press secretary, Mike McCurry. ... Clinton later emerged from a private session with Netanyahu and said the prime minister again lobbied for the spokesman to be fired. "He wants you out," a bemused Clinton told McCurry, who stayed at the White House until 1998." ...

"Netanyahu left no doubt in 2012 that he wanted his old friend Mitt Romney to beat President Barack Obama. And his decision to blindside Obama by accepting Speaker John Boehner's invitation to speak to a joint meeting of Congress is a clear slap at a president who has a different policy toward Iran's nuclear program. His persistence in giving the speech has sparked a round of stories declaring U.S.-Israeli relations at an all-time low."

"But clashes between the leaders of the two staunch allies are more common than it seems.

"Some of the differences are simply political. Les Francis, who was deputy chief of staff to Democratic President Jimmy Carter, recalls a meeting of high-level Carter aides when Menachem Begin, representing the hard-line Likud Party, won election in June 1977. "When it was clear that Likud was going to win, a pall went over the room," Francis told National Journal.

"Sometimes the differences come from above. Late in the Yom Kippur War in 1973, National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger placed a desperate call from the White House Situation Room to Israeli Ambassador Simcha Dinitz. Kissinger was furious that all White House messages to Labor Party Prime Minister Golda Meir were being blocked and Israeli troops were ignoring U.N. cease-fire resolutions and American calls to stop their drive into Egypt. "Jesus Christ," yelled Kissinger into the phone. "Don't you realize how important this is?"

"According to Presidents in Crisis, a new history just out by Michael K. Bohn, who ran the Situation Room for several years, Kissinger suddenly became subdued at the ambassador's quiet reply: "Henry, my government might be more persuaded if you invoke the name of a different prophet."

"Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush were often frustrated by Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir. Perhaps the most public crisis in the relationship came in 1991 when Bush and Shamir clashed over the one topic that has divided almost every president from almost every prime minister—Israel's construction of settlements in occupied Palestinian territories.

"Unhappy over the impact the settlements were having on the peace process, Bush held up $10 billion in loan guarantees for Israel. Bush was blasted by one Israeli Cabinet minister as a "liar" and an "anti-Semite.""

- February 28, 2015, National Journal, 'Netanyahu, Obama—current fight is only the latest between leaders of the two nations.'

"During a cabinet meeting on Sunday, Netanyahu announced he had spoken with Pollard's wife Esther and US Secretary of State John Kerry. "I told him that the uncertain state of Jonathan's health is an additional reason to set him free," said Netanyahu of his conversation with Kerry. ...

"The Conference of Presidents, a central coordinating body that represents 50 US Jewish organizations, sent a letter to President Barack Obama requesting Pollard's immediate release and also issued a statement on its Facebook page on Sunday. ...

"In a letter that was sent to President Obama the organization wrote, "The Commission's allegation that Mr. Pollard's espionage 'was the greatest compromise of US security to that date' is false; and not supported by any evidence in the public record or the classified file. Yet it was this fiction that the Parole Commission cited to deny parole."

"The letter was signed by high-ranking US officials including former director of the CIA Robert James Woolsey, former chairs of the Senate Intelligence Committee Senator Dennis DeConcini and Senator David F. Durenburger, and Former US National Security Advisor Robert C. McFarlane. ...

"In an interview with Channel 2 TV's investigative program "Uvda," former Mossad agent Rafael "Raful" [Rafi] Eitan – who was Pollard's handler - gave a rare glimpse into the events leading up to his arrest.

"Eitan said that once Pollard began to raise suspicions, he gave him the signal for a prearranged escape plan that would get him safely out of the United States.

"Instead, Pollard waited three days before arriving unannounced at the Israeli embassy, asking for asylum. ...

"Eitan took the heat for the fiasco, saying he acted on his own and resigned as head of an Israeli intelligence agency known as the Scientific Relations Office - which was later disbanded entirely."

- December 8, 2014, Ynet News (Israel News), 'Netanyahu pushes for Pollard's release after hospitalization'. Former CIA director James Woolsey is the leading neocon in the United States. Both Woolsey and McFarlane appear in ISGP's Superclass Index.